Choosing a Falco driver

Falco works by taking Linux system call information at runtime, and rebuilding the state of the kernel in memory. The Falco engine depends on a driver in order to consume the raw stream of system call information. Currently the Falco project supports 3 different drivers in which the engine can consume this information.

• A kernel module
• An eBPF probe
• A ptrace(2) userspace program

This blog will highlight the nuances of each implementation and explain why they exist. Hopefully this resource will give you a starting point for understanding which driver is right for your use case.

Updated: Falco 0.26.0

Kernel Module

The Falco Kernel module is the traditional way of consuming the required stream of data from the kernel.

Source: github.com/falcosecurity/libs/driver

The kernel module must be loaded in order for Falco to start. The kernel module depends on the linux-headers package in order to compile. More information .

Note: A convenience script found here

Using the kernel module

cd ~
git clone https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco
cd falco
mkdir build
cd build
cmake ../ \
      -DBUILD_BPF=OFF \
      -DBUILD_WARNINGS_AS_ERRORS="OFF" \
      -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release" \
      -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX="/usr" \
      -DFALCO_ETC_DIR="/etc/falco" \
      -DUSE_BUNDLED_DEPS=ON
make driver
sudo insmod driver/falco.ko
sudo falco

Pros

The kernel module is the most commonly used driver for Falco and can be used in any environment where loading a kernel module is trusted and viable.

• The module can be built, hosted, and installed directly onto a hosted system.
• The Falco community offers limited support for pre-building kernel modules.
• Will work regardless of kernel version (as compared to eBPF below)

Cons

• Tightly coupled with the host kernel and changing kernel versions, architecture, operating systems can introduce complexity.
• A faulty kernel module could potentially panic or crash a Linux kernel.
• Loading a kernel module is not always trusted or allowed in some environments.

Summary

Kernel modules are the quickest, and most common way to run Falco. They are a viable solution in any environment where access to the host kernel is trusted.

• Kubernetes
• AWS EC2 (kops, eks, kubeadm) Anywhere access to the host is allowed
• Azure
• IBM Cloud

eBPF Probe

The Falco eBPF probe is a viable option in environments where kernel modules are not trusted or are not allowed but eBPF programs are. The most common example of this environment is GKE. Running Falco in GKE was the original use case for creating the eBPF probe.

Source: github.com/falcosecurity/libs/driver/bpf

The eBPF probe must be loaded in order for Falco to start, and will provide the same stream of metrics that the kernel module does. Falco should work seamlessly with this approach.

Using the eBPF probe

Note: Notice the -DBUILD_BPF=ON flag Note: A convenience script found here

cd ~
git clone https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco
cd falco
mkdir build
cd build
cmake ../ \
      -DBUILD_BPF=ON \
      -DBUILD_WARNINGS_AS_ERRORS="OFF" \
      -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release" \
      -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX="/usr" \
      -DFALCO_ETC_DIR="/etc/falco" \
      -DUSE_BUNDLED_DEPS=ON
make bpf
cp driver/bpf/falco.o ${HOME}/.falco/probe.o
sudo falco

Pros

• The eBPF probe can be ran in environments like GKE where loading a kernel module is not an option.
• eBPF is considered safer, and unable to crash or panic a kernel. The eBPF code is already compiled into a Linux kernel, and is simply enabled using the eBPF program.
• The eBPF probe can be dynamically loaded into a kernel at runtime, and does not require using tools like dkms, modprobe, or insmod to load the program.

Cons

• The eBPF probe does not work for every system.
• You need at least Linux kernel version 4.14 but the Falco project suggests an LTS kernel of 4.14/4.19 or above.

Summary

The eBPF probe should be used when loading a kernel module is not a viable option. Reasons for not loading a kernel module may change, and in this case the eBPF probe is the default.

• Kubernetes
• GKE
• Environments where loading a kernel module is untrusted or not supported

pdig

The pdig binary is the newest and most viable path forward when both a kernel module, and eBPF probe is not an option. The most common example of this environment is AWS ECS with Fargate.

The pdig tool is built on ptrace(2). It requires CAP_SYS_PTRACE enabled for the container runtime. The pdig tool enables a new way of consuming metrics about a given application at the process level.

Note: The eBPF probe and kernel module work at a global host level, whereas pdig works at a process level. A clever invocation of pdig against a system can simulate a broader scope of system parsing. PID 1 is sometimes of interest.

Source: github.com/falcosecurity/pdig

Pros

• Lightweight, safe, and process specific
• Runs only in userspace
• Enables Falco for use cases when a kernel module, and an eBPF probe is not viable

Cons

• The dependency on ptrace(2) is slow. Period.
• Requires executing Falco with the pdig binary to "hack" the driver.

Summary

The pdig tool is the most unique of all the drivers, and enables functionality not otherwise possible.

• Kubernetes
• AWS ECS/Fargate
• AWS EKS/Fargate
• Environments where kernel modules and eBPF is not an option

Suggested Cloud Provider Implementations

• ←Previous
Next→